[MD] Chance v. Dynamic Quality

[Platt Holden]

> [Platt]
> The usual resort to personal attack..
> 
> [Arlo]
> Which, you'll notice, followed the usual evasions and obfuscations. You
> can't
> combat that type of rhetoric with intellect. You just can't. And so I call
> a
> fool a fool.

The predictable second personal attack . 


> But here's another attempt. 
> 
> YOU keep denigrating chance. YOU keep saying "it's not chance, it's DQ".
> What
> are the DISTINCTIONS?
> 
> Can you give me one? Any one at all? Any? Give me ONE distinction
> between
> "chance" and "DQ". One. Just one. 

You'll find the answer in Lila. Suggest you read it.