[MD] Quality-as-pre-conceptual/MOQ as conceptual
MarshaV
marshalz at charter.net
Sat Mar 14 09:28:32 PDT 2009
At 12:05 PM 3/14/2009, you wrote:
>Hello Marsha
>
>Sat Mar. 14 you said
>
>
> > Thank you for the explanation of your '???'. Now I get that you were
> > being sarcastic to prove a point. Honestly I had no idea what you were
> > on to. All I realized was that you were butchering the RMP quote. Now
> > I think I understand, but I still think you are confusing the pointing
> > to moon and the moon. Quality (the label, a name) is a designation.
>
>Glad to have your confidence again. Since I wrote the post I
>have been working on an "rationale" but it takes time and new
>posts directed my way arrive. Well there are RMP quotes I like
>to "butcher" but the said one from ZAMM is one of my favorite
>once it is "refined" to fit the final MOQ. About the label "moon"
>and the moon is ... oh never mind.
Bo,
Oh never mind? But isn't that the point? Are talking in code? I
await the arrival of this new rationale?
Marsha
.
_____________
Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list