[MD] Chance v. Dynamic Quality

[Michael Poloukhine]

> > Arlo asks:
> > YOU denigrate "chance" saying "it's not chance, it's DQ". YOU provide me
> > ONE distinction, JUST ONE between the two.

MP: Platt is on his own, but as I see it ...

- Chance is quantifiable. One can use mathematics to estimate or roughly 
predict the results of chance. You can't do that with Quality; Quality and its 
direct results are only qualifiable. 

- Chance is a measure (of the lack of something, eg: order,) Quality is 
immeasurable. If you can measure something that comes as a result of Quality, 
you must be measuring something else upon/in/through/by which Quality was 
manifest through experience.

- Chance is only found in results, Quality precedes results.

Or do I mis-understand Quality?

MP
----
"Don't believe everything you think."