[MD] Subjectivity in the MOQ

[Michael Poloukhine]

> Platt,
> Because the morality you mention is social, what most of us value,
> and you like to exhault, is the freedom of the individual. Telling others
> what is right and wrong, or better, misses the point of the MoQ
> discuss is it not?
> And Michael, abortion is a very personal matter, a social matter, I really
> do not see the point in an intellectual discussion regarding it,
> unless you are 
> purposely looking to pick a pointless arguement of opinion.
> Intellectual arguements about social and cultural conventions serve
> only to stir emotion. 
> Are you here to discuss or spoil for a fight? one begins to wonder
> at this point.
> 
> -Ron

MP: I'm here to discuss, Ron. 

FWIW IMO most discussions in here are utterly pointless arguments of opinion 
(Q or DQ? please!) even when *not* considered against what is arguably the 
most important subject regarding human interaction; the subject of what value 
we ascribe to human life v. personal freedom. That you consider it merely a 
"social and cultural convention" leads me to believe you probably aren't a 
vegetarian either.




MP
----
"Don't believe everything you think."