[MD] Chance v. Dynamic Quality

[Platt Holden]

> [Platt]
> You bet chance and DQ are different. The former identifies ignorance of 
> underlying cause. The latter identifies speechless, wondrous surprise. 
> 
> [Krimel]
> Chance allows prediction or reduction of uncertainty in the absence of
> complete knowledge of underlying cause.

"Absence of complete knowledge," i.e., ignorance

> As we have come to understand,
> complete knowledge of underlying causality is impossible.

"Complete knowledge  . . . impossible, i.e., ignorance.

> DQ may produce
> speechless wonder and surprise it may also produce horror, disgust and
> dred. All are responses to change and uncertainty. 

Please support that with evidence. I can't find it. Few responses to change 
and uncertainty are DQ responses. Most are static responses from one's 
social and intellectual patterns, as any number of behavior studies 
demonstrate. If horror, disgust or dread is involved, the likely source is 
a social or intellectual pattern reacting to a biological pattern. DQ.is 
something else all together -- the response to no patterns.