[MD] The Brujo

[MarshaV]

At 05:33 PM 3/21/2009, you wrote:


>-----Original Message-----
>From: MarshaV [mailto:marshalz at charter.net]
>Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 5:26 PM
>To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>Subject: Re: [MD] The Brujo
>
>At 05:11 PM 3/21/2009, you wrote:
> >[Marsha]
> >If you look into the causes and conditions of a pattern, then their
> >causes and conditions, and theirs, and theirs, and theirs,,, you can
> >only come to the conclusion that all leads to the net-of-jewels, but
> >of course even causes and conditions are empty of inherent existence
> >and conceptually constructed.  So...
> >
> >[Krimel]
> >That image of Indras net works so well because it is so precise.
> >The human nervous system is just such a net.
> >Pulses of energy flowing through uncountable pathways.
> >Infinitely interconnected in currents of:
> >Sensation, emotion, locomotion, ingestion, digestion, elimination...
> >That wet jeweled net of nerves shimmers with:
> >Recollections, reflections, and projections.
> >Association and habits cluster and strobe
> >Into patterns of rhythm and mood.
> >
> >And always at the edge is the fizz of conversion.
> >Light becoming sight and warmth.
> >Force becoming sound, touch, motion and space.
> >Chemistry becoming taste and smell and itch.
> >They are all fish flopping in the net.
> >We send them swimming into streams of consciousness
> >Reformatted and transformed into living ideas flowing through
> >The intricate structures of our hopes and dreams.
> >
> >Being "empty of inherent existence" doesn't diminish their power.
> >A rose by any other name can still prick your finger.
> >
> >But that is just the incurable romantic realist in me.
>
>[Marsha]
>I'm repeating a question from a few posts ago because I want you to answer:
>       Is there even one thing that is not dependent
>       on being conceptually constructed
>       and established
>       by conventional agreement?
>
>The incurable, romantic Krimel is most charming, but I would like you
>to answer the question.
>
>[Krimel]
>To answer I must use some kind of weird mojo code because concepts is all I
>can offer.
>
>But sensation is independent of conceptual construction.

Krimel,

  'Sensation' is conceptually constructed and established by 
conventional agreement.  What is indivisible, undefinable and unknowable?


Marsha









.
_____________

Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.