[MD] Chance v. Dynamic Quality

[Platt Holden]

> [Platt]
> Anyone who wants to can research the archives to see how you mock, 
> demonize
> and try to marginalize those who disagree with your views.
> 
> [Arlo]
> Not true. Let them check. I have no qualms. What I mock and demonize are
> moronic statements. And you're giving me quite a few here.

[Pirsig]
"To say that a comment is 'stupid' (moronic) is to imply that the person 
who makes it is stupid (moronic). This is the 'ad hominem argument' meaning 
'to the person.' Logically it is irrelevant . . . (But) but the MOQ allows 
one to go deeper . . . It says the ad hominem argument is a form of evil." 
(LC, note 140, parens added).

Case closed.