[MD] Morality, Abortion and the MoQ

[Michael Poloukhine]

Can we please have some MoQ responses to this:

> Steve wrote:
> In considering the MOQ's take on the abortion issue it may be helpful
> to consider he MOQ's understanding of humanity. A human being is a
> forest of patterns of all four types. A biological homo sapien is not
> automatically human just for having the right DNA. A homo sapien
> without any social patterns is a purely biological entity--an animal.
> It is impossible for me to consider a zygote to be a person, and the
> MOQ can't see it that way either since a zygote cannot participate in
> social patterns.

Is this an accurate reckoning of MoQ's understanding of the "evolution" of a 
human life, and more importantly how that human life compares to other life 
during its "evolution"?

A little help here MoQers? DMB? Ron? Arlo? Anyone?

It makes MoQ sense to me, I'd like to know if its MoQ. If it is, it answers quite 
clearly I think the entire "life" issue I identified at the outset as the underpinning 
of subsequent discussion.

MP
----
"Don't believe everything you think."