[MD] Chance v. Dynamic Quality

[Krimel]

[Krimel]
> Right, every moment is loaded with DQ. We can elect to filter
> that DQ through our static patterns of conception and habit. This
> is certainly comfortable but can lead to total reliance on those
> conceptual patterns. The moment becomes dynamic not by killing
> static patterns completely, but seeing them for what they are and
> rendering them transparent.
>

Joe
Since DQ is undefined, one way to study the moment is to try to understand
how SQ is transparent. How does it relate to me/DQ/the moment?  How does it
relate to the order of evolution MOQ?  Is it active or passive or neutral?
Yeah!  All this in the blink of an eye.  If sometimes Homer nods, do I
sometimes nod over DQ/SQ.  Can I train myself to stay awake a little more by
study?


[Krimel]
OK but I don't think DQ is undefined. Quality is undefined. I think  
Pirsig conflated the two out of enthusiasm and others follow out of  
blind obedience.