[MD] The Quality/MOQ dichotomy

[MarshaV]

Loco or Loki?



At 06:24 PM 3/8/2009, you wrote:
>Andre
>
>On 7 March:
>
>DMB had said to Andre:
>
> > > I hope that helps. I really do.
>
>Andre:
> > It does dmb and thank you for this. To give Bodvar credit, he is
> > certainly committed and has the integrity of the MoQ at heart. And the
> > other thing is that he is consistent and has been so over the years. I
> > have not the understanding of the MoQ to the extent he suggests he has.
> > I really am convinced that before you can play with something you have
> > to understand it completely. Once you know this you can become creative
> > (and perhaps develop new insights). I am not there yet with regards to
> > the MoQ, not by a long shot.Bodvar has to account for these himself.
>
>You seem torn between DMB and me. Hope you don't develop
>schizo ... something ;-)
>
> > There are some questions I have put to Bodvar that are still hanging.
>
>Er.... I may have overlooked some posts in the recent flood. What
>were the questions?
>
> > In the mean time, I keep on going over the static MoQ (ZMM, Lila etc,)
> > in my attempt to integrate it with my own q experiences and
> > reflections. And rest assured, Pirsig (and McWatt) remain the
> > authority for me.
>
> > The MoQ is a wonderful thing and through this discuss and contributors
> > such as yourself, Platt, Bodvar,Ron, Marsha and many others (past and
> > present) we will develop the MoQ in the process of living it.
>
>Wish I was as nice and polite as you.
>
>Bodvar
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

.
_____________

Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.