[MD] Cosmic Experience
plattholden at gmail.com
plattholden at gmail.com
Tue May 5 06:18:27 PDT 2009
All:
An ancient conundrum facing S/O science which assumes every event
has a cause is the problem of First Cause. For example, what caused
the Big Bang? If you think you know the answer then the question
arises what caused the cause of the Big Bang. Then, what caused
that? Quickly you are into infinite regress.
Among the many things that attracted me to the MOQ is Pirsig's
answer to this perennial problem. In a little noted response to the
question, "How could experience arise from a level of no experience?"
Pirsig said in his annotations in Lila's Child:
"Since experience is the starting point, it doesn't arise from a lower
level of no experience. Logically speaking, a starting point that arises
from something else is no longer a starting part."
So what is science's starting point? Something like a "quantum
fluctuation" that just happened (oops) to have caused the Big Bang.
>From whence came the law governing quantum fluctuations? Science's
answer, "Don't ask."
By contrast, in the MOQ the starting point is boundless, timeless,
causeless experience "which cannot be called either physical or
psychical. It logically precedes that distinction." (Lila, 29)
This leads me to conclude that the ground of being is perennial
experience or, as some prefer, "cosmic consciousness," a conclusion
backed by no less a scientific light than Erwin Schroedinger: "The
external world and consciousness are one and the same thing."
This leads me further to conclude that the brain, rather than being
the seat of consciousness, is like the ears, eyes, nose, mouth, and
skin - a sense organ accessing consciousness (experience), the
cradle of existence suffusing the universe, immutable and eternal..
What do you think?
Platt
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list