[MD] Patterns s/o or relationship???

[X Acto]

Platt, Marsha,
 Basically that is what she is saying only she uses the term relationship
which is commonly understood as interaction between objects, but, she
already states that what we assume as objects are actually greater sets
of relationships, relationships of relationships or a better word for what 
she is describing is value.

As I keep hammering on, common assumptions about common terms
in our culture is what creates philosophical paradox , the failure
of rationalism. Our language is based on the grammatic predication
of subjects and objects. So even when we hear the term relationships
we automatically conceptualize the interaction of objects and have difficulty
even forming concepts about entityless abstractions. The same goes for value,
The terms "value" and "relationship" are almost meaningless without
the conventional conception of objects.
Physicists have understood the inherent emptiness of reality for the past
60-70 yrs but has yet to percolate to the public.
This is why SOL is redundant and obsolete, as MoQists
we already know this, physicists already know this.
Pirsig uses the lingual distinction of Dq/Sq just to avoid
essentialism in conception.

-Ron





________________________________
From: "plattholden at gmail.com" <plattholden at gmail.com>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2009 7:16:19 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] Patterns s/o or relationship???

On 5 May 2009 at 6:56, MarshaV wrote:

> 
> Are all physicist as enlightened as this one???
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRduOpj1R7c&feature=related
> 
> 
> 4:05 minutes

Marsha,

Don't you think this physicist would be more enlightened if she had 
acknowledged the role of values in the structure of the universe? 
Emphasizing relationships and interconnections as she does strikes me as 
assuming an S/O premise. 

Thanks for the link.

Platt

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/