[MD] Protestant Capitalism

[MarshaV]

Ron,

Don't you think Bo has a valid point.  It seems impossible to 
breakaway from the subject/object chatter which is entrapment.


Marsha




At 04:17 AM 5/21/2009, you wrote:
>Ron
>
>On 19 May you wrote:
>
> > Are you saying that Platt is on firm MoQ ground by being
> > anti-intellectual?
>
>Yes, the greatest obstacle is the 4th. level because - prior to the MOQ
>- it was reality  itself  (like the 3rd and 2nd. and 1st have been in their
>time) Platt isn't "anti-intellectual", but sees the 4th. level for 
>what it is,
>namely a static level that refuses a dynamic pattern to form a new
>reality The MOQ is of course no static level, but in this particular
>context it has a level-like relationship with intellect.
>
> > Also, are you saying that ALL intellectual patterns are more moral than
> > social patterns?
>
>Yes, intellect is the highest static level, yet the mere knowledge of the
>dynamic/static context (that the upper level is dependent the lower
>level for its own good) prevents intellect from undermining its social
>base. The big question is if it prevents the MOQ from undermining its
>own base - intellect - I mean if it can go on after being reduced to a
>static level? (footnote).
>
> > Essentially you are saying that no one knows intellectual quality unless
> > they subscribe to your SOL. -Ron
>
>That's right, but it isn't really "my SOL" In ZAMM's proto-moq there is
>just one "static" (classic) level - the SOM - but it's also called 
>"intellect"
>so it was clearly Phaedrus's original idea. And in LILA there are many
>indications that SOM is no foreign matter that has polluted intellect, but
>the very article.
>
>IMO
>
>Bo
>
>
>Footnote:
>This is the "intellect joining forces with biology to quell society"
>phenomenon  brought one notch up. The MOQ joining forces with
>social value to quell intellect. This would be a disaster and why I at
>times wonder about the MOQ. It's valid as .... but is it GOOD?
>Perhaps better let it continue in its harmless "academical" vein, letting .
>Anthony McWatt and David Buchanan be the administrators of Pirsig's
>legacy.
>
>
>
>
>
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


.
_____________

The self is a thought-flow of ever-changing, interrelated and 
interconnected, inorganic, biological, social and intellectual, 
static patterns of value responding to Dynamic Quality.

.
.