[MD] Is it serious?

[MarshaV]

At 09:45 PM 5/25/2009, you wrote:

>Krimel:
>Evolution on the other hand recognizes chance and chaos as the creative
>background from which static patterns emerge. The MoQ could get with this
>program as well if could at last free itself of the mystico-theistic baggage
>some here insist on packaging it with. But no I don't thing Nature is
>intelligent rather it is opportunistic and intelligence emerges from the
>layering of static patterns churning up in the wake of DQ. In other word
>saying that Nature has intelligence growing in it is not the same as saying
>Nature is intelligent.

Marsha:
Krimel, do you mean mystico like in mystico-scientific representing 
the General Theory of Relativity and Quantum Physics?   Talk about 
packaging and churning static patterns!!!





.
_____________

The self is a thought-flow of ever-changing, interrelated and 
interconnected, inorganic, biological, social and intellectual, 
static patterns of value responding to Dynamic Quality.

.
.