[MD] LC: Expanded Annotation 57

[MarshaV]

Ron,

What would you say about my interpretation?  Don't worry I'm just a 
woman, there's nothing really to worry about, I don't really bite.


Marsha





At 01:44 PM 5/27/2009, you wrote:
>Bo:
>This pertains to Pirsig's (silly) "Quality as Dynamic and the MOQ as
>static". The "Quality=Reality" postulate is part and parcel of the MOQ,
>because it does not mean a thing without the static counterpoint. To
>speak of a Quality independent of the MOQ is both impossible and
>counterproductive,
>
>Ron:
>I think I see why you have trouble with this Bo, when
>you stated that dynamic quality is correlative to it's
>static counterpoint, you are on the money and that
>is what is trying to be stated. Dynamic and Static
>are words for experience, these words are Quality
>too but are defined as static because they have
>universal meaning and are symbolic of expereince
>they are describing.
>MoQ then is Quality but it is defined as static from the standpoint
>of the universal understanding of concepts, it is dynamic in the
>particular experience.
>
>enough!
>
>
>
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


.
_____________

The self is a thought-flow of ever-changing, interrelated and 
interconnected, inorganic, biological, social and intellectual, 
static patterns of value responding to Dynamic Quality.

.
.