[MD] LC: Expanded Annotation 57

[X Acto]

Krimel,
I think the context in which people communicate says alot about
what they value in terms of meaning. There are those that value
empiricism or what is commonly referred to as inductive reasoning
and those who prefer rationalism or deductive reasoning.

I think it is important when having these discussions at least when
the conversation leads to physics, that a proper foundation in quantum
physics is desired because that is where the two meet in practicle theory.
This is where empirists question the level of deduction in their observations
and rationalists are grounded in the inductive consequences of their deductions.

Newtonian concepts still clutter up the field of debate even now. The bogeyman
that really isn't there anymore except in common amatuer assumptions of entityship
and vacuumes.

I think the discussions could get very interesting because then it turns toward
the validity in meaning in the vien of Pragmatism. Because, I think, everyone
here can agree that in a universe of value, meaning is primary, relative and 
contextual. truth is the value of meaning.


-ron


 



________________________________
From: Krimel <Krimel at Krimel.com>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 10:27:16 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] LC: Expanded Annotation 57

[John]
Krimel's physical base seems like just a plain old physical base, something
you set a vase on, value free.  Or rather, perhaps having value as in
different values, but no such thing as good and bad.

[Krimel]
"Plain old physical base"? Is that like in boring humdrum, been there done
that? I suspect that is what the "all who get it" folks think. Or as I like
to call them the Aw-Gi Cult as in"  "Aw Gi doesn't that feel nice?"

Look at just how weird and mysterious the "physical base" is: time and space
changing shape and morphing, tiny bits phasing in and out of existence,
fractional dimensions in infinite number overlapping in patterns of
interference, dynamic flows of energy and matter spontaneously taking shapes
of infinite complexity.

You call that "plain old"?

Sure the Aw-Gi Cult thinks this is yucky and prefer to treat their navels
like Jack Honer's pie. They want to sit in the corner and think about what
clever boys and girls they are because they have found a way to massage
their frontal lobes into "oneness" without any math or logic or any "thing"
at all.

But I never said there was no such thing as good and bad, only that they are
relative terms.




Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/