[MD] qUALITY
markhsmit
markhsmit at aol.com
Thu May 28 18:26:38 PDT 2009
On May 28, 2009, at 7:29:33 AM, Krimel <Krimel at Krimel.com> wrote:
From: Krimel <Krimel at Krimel.com>
Subject: Re: [MD] qUALITY
Date: May 28, 2009 7:29:33 AM PDT
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Willblake2 asks:
Is Quality the immediate present (which is timeless), or is it more than
that?
[Krimel]
Dave can fill you in on the Aw Gi party line but his friend Rosenthal says
in her lecture that the present is not timeless at all. It carries with it
the remnants of the past and potential of the future.
I would say, with due respect to Rosenthal, that there are no remnants in the immediate
present. As soon as it is captured and converted to neuronal activity or thought,
it is already the past. This takes many thousands of microseconds. The immediate
present has no past or future. I suppose this is Quality, but how would I know the
unknowable? Don't know, but I do, just like everybody else does, every instant
of every day. "I" am the knower and Quality is known (with apologies to Pirsig).
Willblake2
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list