[MD] qUALITY

MarshaV marshalz at charter.net
Fri May 29 05:03:06 PDT 2009



Thank you, but I'm sure it is a MOQ reinterpretation of something 
Krishnamurti has said.


At 07:59 AM 5/29/2009, you wrote:
>I like that Marsha.
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
>From: MarshaV <marshalz at charter.net>
>To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 7:43:10 AM
>Subject: Re: [MD] qUALITY
>
>
>
>Is it that the self (static patterns of value) is a constituent of
>Quality, but too often mistakes itself for the generator of Quality?
>
>
>
>At 06:57 AM 5/29/2009, you wrote:
> >Is'nt the "I" composed of Quality? the mistake is
> >assuming entity-ship of Quality ...one entity = one consciousness.
> >this is not so. Quality is not an entity. niether is the "I".
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >________________________________
> >From: markhsmit <markhsmit at aol.com>
> >To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> >Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 9:26:38 PM
> >Subject: Re: [MD] qUALITY
> >
> >
> >On May 28, 2009, at 7:29:33 AM, Krimel <Krimel at Krimel.com> wrote:
> >From:  Krimel <Krimel at Krimel.com>
> >Subject:    Re: [MD] qUALITY
> >Date:  May 28, 2009 7:29:33 AM PDT
> >To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> >Willblake2 asks:
> >Is Quality the immediate present (which is timeless), or is it more than
> >that?
> >
> >[Krimel]
> >Dave can fill you in on the Aw Gi party line but his friend Rosenthal says
> >in her lecture that the present is not timeless at all. It carries with it
> >the remnants of the past and potential of the future.
> >
> >I would say, with due respect to Rosenthal, that there are no
> >remnants in the immediate
> >present.  As soon as it is captured and converted to neuronal
> >activity or thought,
> >it is already the past.  This takes many thousands of
> >microseconds.  The immediate
> >present has no past or future.  I suppose this is Quality, but how
> >would I know the
> >unknowable?  Don't know, but I do, just like everybody else does,
> >every instant
> >of every day.  "I" am the knower and Quality is known (with
> >apologies to Pirsig).
> >
> >Willblake2
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Moq_Discuss mailing list
> >Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> >Archives:
> >http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> >http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> >
> >
> >Moq_Discuss mailing list
> >Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> >Archives:
> >http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> >http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Moq_Discuss mailing list
> >Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> >Archives:
> >http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> >http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
>
>.
>_____________
>
>The self is a thought-flow of ever-changing, interrelated and
>interconnected, inorganic, biological, social and intellectual,
>static patterns of value responding to Dynamic Quality.
>
>.
>.
>
>
>
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
>
>
>
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


.
_____________

The self is a thought-flow of ever-changing, interrelated and 
interconnected, inorganic, biological, social and intellectual, 
static patterns of value responding to Dynamic Quality.

.
.






More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list