[MD] in defence of the "relative"

[MarshaV]

Steve,  

P.S.  Where is this universal meaning of relativism that everyone but me
understand?  But you can change it with every post, it's all just analogy
anyway....  You seem to be confused.        


Marsha


-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of MarshaV
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:09 PM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] in defence of the "relative"



-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of Steven Peterson
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 1:52 PM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] in defence of the "relative"

> Steve:
> If not, I wonder what value you find in telling others that
> you are a relativist. What meaning do you think others will
> take from your claim?
>
> Marsha:
> WTF should I care?  This is a website to explore MoQ related ideas.

Steve:
I don't understand why you would want to post to this forum if you do
not care whether or not anyone else understands what you are saying.
Why bother ever saying anything at all if what you say is only
relative to your patterns?
 
Marsha:
The words I used meant something different to me than the way you
interpreted them.  Ahhh, that's relativism!  I care very much for the MoQ
and the people on this list.  And no, this will not turn into me defending
my choice of words or phrases.  

I did say I wasn't ready for a serious discussion on relativism yet; maybe
you and Ron can dance with each other for a while.  



Marsha    

  

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/