[MD] in defence of the "relative"

[MarshaV]

Steve,

By the way, what is your definition of relativism?  I might like to think
about it, while I'm reading these yummy books.  Or maybe you don't really
have a definition.  Maybe you just want to win the game.  That will be
pretty tough to do, since I accept paradox as the norm, like the wind can
seem cool to you and warm to me, and so it goes...    

Marsha



-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of Steven Peterson
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:16 PM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] in defence of the "relative"

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:14 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> Steve,
>
> P.S.  Where is this universal meaning of relativism that everyone but me
> understand?  But you can change it with every post, it's all just analogy
> anyway....  You seem to be confused.

Are you ready to have a discussion or not?
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/