[MD] MOQ and the Future: An Inquiry into Usefulness

Arlo Bensinger ajb102 at psu.edu
Fri Nov 13 10:47:51 PST 2009


[Arlo had said]
Despite Platt's willful ignorance on the topic of emergence, the MOQ 
proposes an emergentist explanation to how things came to be, not a 
creative one. Nothing "created" the Universe, the Universe "emerged" 
as a response to Quality. Nothing "created" carbon atoms, what we 
call "carbon atoms" are patterns that emerged from subatomic 
particles responding to Quality, to their free (albeit very limited) 
response to DQ.

[Arlo makes a small correction]
Despite Platt's willful ignorance on the topic of emergence, the MOQ 
proposes an emergentist explanation to how things came to be, not a 
*creationist* one. Nothing "created" the Universe, the Universe 
"emerged" as a response to Quality. Nothing "created" carbon atoms, 
what we call "carbon atoms" are patterns that emerged from subatomic 
particles responding to Quality, to their free (albeit very limited) 
response to DQ.




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list