[MD] MOQ and the Future: An Inquiry into Usefulness
Arlo Bensinger
ajb102 at psu.edu
Fri Nov 13 14:10:34 PST 2009
[Platt]
So goodness is always there to be "seen" or "deemed" as such by
quarks, atoms, molecules, amoebas, animals, colleges, nations, novels
theorems, axioms and all other static patterns?
[Arlo]
Quality is the foundation, the landscape, the frame, the firmament,
yes. I personally would not use the word "goodness" as to me it
implies some conceptualization of the Quality-response. An amoeba
retracts from acid because of a valuation of "low quality".
[Platt]
Neither.
[Arlo]
That can't be, because you stated that the reason quarks prefer the
attractions they do is to make a cosmos recognizable (and
inhabitable) by "man". So either they have decided to do this, or
Quality is ordering them to do this. How else could "man" factor into
their value preferences?
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list