[MD] MOQ and the Future: An Inquiry into Usefulness

Arlo Bensinger ajb102 at psu.edu
Fri Nov 13 14:10:34 PST 2009


[Platt]
So goodness is always there to be "seen" or "deemed" as such by 
quarks, atoms, molecules, amoebas, animals, colleges, nations, novels 
theorems, axioms and all other static patterns?

[Arlo]
Quality is the foundation, the landscape, the frame, the firmament, 
yes. I personally would not use the word "goodness" as to me it 
implies some conceptualization of the Quality-response. An amoeba 
retracts from acid because of a valuation of "low quality".

[Platt]
Neither.

[Arlo]
That can't be, because you stated that the reason quarks prefer the 
attractions they do is to make a cosmos recognizable (and 
inhabitable) by "man". So either they have decided to do this, or 
Quality is ordering them to do this. How else could "man" factor into 
their value preferences?





More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list