[MD] MOQ and the Future: An Inquiry into Usefulness
ARLO J BENSINGER JR
ajb102 at psu.edu
Sun Nov 15 08:27:50 PST 2009
[Steve]
That is my understanding of the MOQ as well.
[Arlo]
Either Platt wants his cake (theism) and eat it to (MOQ terminology), or he's
in denial that he agrees with me (me?! imagine THAT!).
In either event, what's your take on this? Do you see my point that saying
"Quality created carbon atoms" implies and intential force that removes free
value preferences from the subatomic particles?
Let me ask this way, what is the *difference* in saying "God created carbon
atoms" and "Quality created carbon atoms"?
My point is that this is poor word choice. Quality does not "create", Quality
simply "is". Creation occurs as a RESPONSE to Quality. Patterns (SQ) emerge as
a free value response to DQ.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list