[MD] in defence of the "relative"

[MarshaV]

'The Truth About Relativism' by Joseph Margolis arrived.     

After a poetic Preface and Forward, my first reading of the Margolis'
Prologue has left me with: Huh?  Of course I'll give it a second read, but
I'm feeling frustrated. I had hoped Margolis would provide a clear and
understandable (by someone like me) philosopical defense of relativism.
Unpatterned experience & patterned experience and conventional truth &
Ultimute Truth, how complicated need it be?  Cynthia Farrar's book and Ugo
Zilioli's book were quite clearly written.  I'm whining, aren't I?.  I
suppose I should just read the prologue again.