[MD] in defence of the "relative"

[MarshaV]

Agree, but there is sometimes a tendency to of complicate too.    


-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of X Acto
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 9:21 AM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] in defence of the "relative"

Beware of that which is clearly written, for it is probably only reaffirming
your own beliefs.



----- Original Message ----
From: MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Thu, November 19, 2009 4:01:11 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] in defence of the "relative"

'The Truth About Relativism' by Joseph Margolis arrived.    

After a poetic Preface and Forward, my first reading of the Margolis'
Prologue has left me with: Huh?  Of course I'll give it a second read, but
I'm feeling frustrated. I had hoped Margolis would provide a clear and
understandable (by someone like me) philosopical defense of relativism.
Unpatterned experience & patterned experience and conventional truth &
Ultimute Truth, how complicated need it be?  Cynthia Farrar's book and Ugo
Zilioli's book were quite clearly written.  I'm whining, aren't I?.  I
suppose I should just read the prologue again. 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/



      
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/