[MD] British Emergentism
craigerb at comcast.net
craigerb at comcast.net
Thu Nov 19 10:23:49 PST 2009
[Craig, previously]
> [Time's starting point begins] with the first experience.
[Platt]
> When was that? "First" implies a point in time.
Your mistake is seeing time & experience as independent.
It's NOT like time was merrily passing along with nothing
happening, then experiences started popping up. Time just
is the sequence of experiences--the first moment of time is
the first experience (&, of course, vice versa).
[Arlo]
> "Time" is a perceptual pattern derived from the experience of
> sufficiently complex patterns of life. Atoms do not experience "time".
This exemplifies the opposite mistake. Consider, the oceans waves,
sometimes SLOWLY rolling in, but DURING a turbulence RAPIDLY
crashing to the shore. Thus it has always been. This difference does
not depend upon humans. It's not as if we could take marijuana
& slow down the waves or take meth & speed them up.
As the poet said "Time & tide wait for no man."
Craig
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list