[MD] Moral cover up
plattholden at gmail.com
plattholden at gmail.com
Sat Nov 21 05:33:05 PST 2009
Hi All,
The following illustrates the insidiousness of political correctness:
No words are more typical of our moral culture than "inappropriate" and
"unacceptable." They seem bland, gentle even, yet they carry the full force
of official power. When you hear them, you feel that you are being tied up
with little pieces of soft string.
Inappropriate and unacceptable began their modern careers in the 1980s as
part of the jargon of political correctness. They have more or less replaced
a number of older, more exact terms: coarse, tactless, vulgar, lewd. They
encompass most of what would formerly have been called "improper" or
"indecent." An affair between a teacher and a pupil that was once improper
is now inappropriate; a once indecent joke is now unacceptable.
This linguistic shift is revealing. Improper and indecent express moral
judgements, whereas inappropriate and unacceptable suggest breaches of
some purely social or professional convention. Such "non-judgemental"
forms of speech are tailored to a society wary of explicit moral language. As
liberal pluralists, we seek only adherence to rules of the game, not
agreement on fundamentals. What was once an offence against decency
must be recast as something akin to a faux pas.
But this new, neutralised language does not spell any increase in freedom.
When I call your action indecent, I state a fact that can be controverted.
When I call it inappropriate, I invoke an institutional context-one which, by
implication, I know better than you. Who can gainsay the Lord Chamberlain
when he pronounces it "inappropriate" to wear jeans to the Queen´s garden
party? This is what makes the new idiom so sinister. Calling your action
indecent appeals to you as a human being; calling it inappropriate asserts
official power.
The point can be generalised. As a society, we strive to eradicate moral
language, hoping to eliminate the intolerance that often accompanies it. But
intolerance has not been eliminated, merely thrust underground.
"Inappropriate" and "unacceptable" are the catchwords of a moralism that
dare not speak its name. They hide all measure of righteous fury behind the
mask of bureaucratic neutrality. For the sake of our own humanity, we
should strike them from our vocabulary.
--from Prospect Magazine, uk.
Regards,
Platt
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list