[MD] (Fwd) Re: British Emergentism

Andre Broersen andrebroersen at gmail.com
Sat Nov 28 07:48:46 PST 2009


John to Steve:
The easiest way to describe my disagreement is when my reality is
conceptual - the LAW of gravity, for instance.  It's a piece of
symbolic reasoning that can be completely and thoroughly encapsulated
by the human mind, transmitted cleanly and in its pattern - conceived
as a piece of reality itself - is only transmittable through language.
   How can you then say that language can't get us any closer to the
reality of the law of gravity?

Andre:
Hi John (again). I think that the MoQ would consider the Law of
Gravity a high quality intellectual PoV as a description of (a part
of) reality. However, this description is not reality itself.

Imho
Andre



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list