[MD] in defence of the "relative"

[Matt Kundert]

A no less curious use of "empiricism" than "relativism."

But, if language-use is experiential, as Pirsig has to be 
committed to saying, then what does that mean for 
"experience verified with experience explains more than 
what can be said about it"?  If "experience" is the broad 
category out of which we can distinguish particular types 
of experience (e.g., inorganic or intellectual), then how 
can your statement make sense?

With Aristotle and all that, I have to apologize, but I didn't 
realize we were talking about the meaning of "meaning" and 
I still don't have a real grasp on your thought-angle.

Matt


> Ron:
> As far as meaning in Pirsigs term "more empirical" if empiricism is the art of explaination
> and MoQ has more explanitory power, then experience verified with experience explains
> more than what can be said about it. "walk a mile in anothers shoes" so to speak.
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141665/direct/01/