[MD] A Lila quote, part one.

[X Acto]

Since objects are illusions, arent all intellectual patterns 
illusions?

Is'nt the question  raised, couched in objective assumption?

Reification is an intepretation of intellectual patterns
therefore it depends on how one interprets intellectual
patterns.
Since a concrete "thing" or physical "object" does not exist,
It most certainly hangs on the interpretation of experience.
Since we are taught to interpret experience as divided into
subjects and objects, and that objects are "real" it would 
seem s/o intellectual patterns are a learned method of 
interpretation. Reification being a consequence of such 
an interpretation for reification is based on the assumption
that objects are "real".

in short     not this, not that

one can not give examples of s/o intellectual patterns
one can not give examples of non s/o intellectual patterns

they are a matter of interpretation.