[MD] the Value of Think Again

[fernandocarlosfarah at mls.com.br]

I do have the power of telepathy, but still think in those poor little words
(fortunatelly!).  i don't believe it's the answer to your prayers...







----- Mensagem de markhsmit at aol.com ---------
    Data: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:57:58 -0700
    De: markhsmit <markhsmit at aol.com>
Endereço para Resposta (Reply-To): moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Assunto: Re: [MD] the Value of Think Again
      Para: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org


> I agree with you John.  While religion and science walk hand in hand
> as part of the intellect, they do speak from different places.  When one
> applies the logic of science to true belief, of course it doesn't 
> fit.  While 
> Spiritual thought often tries to convey understanding using logic
> it is really the wrong language.  This would of course be solved by
> telepathy, where words are not needed, only feelings are conveyed.
> Since, ultimately, that is all words do, convey a feeling from one to
> another, in rather a primitive way I might add.  Thus all the arguments in
> philosophy.  While telepathy exists, we do not know how to intentionally
> use it.
>
> One could say that the believer and the scientist operate by 
> independent rules and laws, kind of like the levels of Quality.
>
> Willblake2
>
> On Oct 8, 2009, at 9:16:39 AM, "John Carl" <ridgecoyote at gmail.com> wrote:
> From:   "John Carl" <ridgecoyote at gmail.com>
> Subject:    [MD] the Value of Think Again
> Date:   October 8, 2009 9:16:39 AM PDT
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>> From the point of view of the theory of evolution, mankind is only one
> species among thousands which have their place within the field of life on
> earth. The fact that people took the theory of evolution as an enemy of
> religion shows only how rigidly they understood the idea of God. But the
> same may be said of scientist and others who now comfortably accept that the
> theory of evolution has disproved the Judeo-Christian understanding of man.
> As we shall see, this only shows how rigidly they have understood nature.
>
> Jacob Needleman, explicating the need to "think again".
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>


----- Final da mensagem de markhsmit at aol.com -----