[MD] irony and socrates
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Wed Oct 14 23:56:56 PDT 2009
Ian,
Like Qubit? Or how about a Quality zoo?
I really think Bo is correct suggesting that a Quality-Level would do much
to untangle the SOM/MoQ point-of-view confusion.
Marsha
-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of Ian Glendinning
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 2:52 AM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] irony and socrates
Bo suggests we
""use" intellect's (S/O) while remembering MOQ's"
Sure Bo.
All I'm suggesting is we give that idea a name ... like
MoQish-Intellect or "quintellect" maybe ... to remind us (and people
who've never had this discussion) that whilst we "named the object"
(as language appears to do) it's more than an intellect constrained by
SOMist objectivity.
Sometimes I think Doug Renselle was on the right lines - inventing a
new language.
Regards
Ian
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:31 AM, <skutvik at online.no> wrote:
> Marsha, All
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list