[MD] irony and socrates

[Joseph Maurer]

On 10/13/09 2:02 AM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

On Tuesday 13 October2009 2:02 AM Marsha writes to Bo:

<snip>
Patterned experience (sq or static patterns of value) is
conceptually constructed, ever-changing, relative and interrelated.
Unpatterned experience (DQ) is indivisible, undefinable and unknowable.
Without expanding on my definition, is there something you do not agree
with?

Hi Marsha and all,

I realize you aimed your comment at what Bo said, but I do not accept that
unpatterened experience (DQ) is indivisible, undefinable and unknowable.
How can we talk and write about it, if  unpatterened, undefinable and
unknowable are denied qualities?  DQ is an analogy or metaphor which are the
ways to express the unpatterened, undefineable and unknowable.  Q is the
root of the analogy. UNdefined is a characteristic common to the last two
levels of evolution Higher Emotional and Higher Intellectual levels which
are levels in Consciousness only.  In the case of Quality, ³un²
distinguishes SQ from DQ because they are known in different ways one
defined, one undefined.

Joe 

<snip>
> Patterned experience (sq or static patterns of value) is
> conceptually constructed, ever-changing, relative and interrelated.
> Unpatterned experience (DQ) is indivisible, undefinable and unknowable.
> Without expanding on my definition, is there something you do not agree
> with?