[MD] Some historical perspective

[MarshaV]

Ian,

I'm curious, what are these "all the more interesting patterns of value"
that you think are being left out of the picture? 


Marsha




-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of Ian Glendinning
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 8:15 AM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] Some historical perspective

Hi Mark (nice to have you around again, BTW) and Bo.

Mark, you said quite succinctly (of Bo to Platt)
"It seems to me, and I may be wrong, that Bo introduces ambiguity when
he fails to recognise there are more intellectual patterns than
subjects and objects?"

That seems about it. He seems intent on working with that "logical
definition" of intellect, whilst ignoring that this leaves all the
more interesting patterns of value out of his picture. I can't believe
that is either what Pirsig intended or better / less-ambiguous than
what Pirsig intended.

Regards
Ian

On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 9:32 PM,  <mark_maxwell at talktalk.net> wrote:
>
> Hi Platt,
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/