[MD] Some historical perspective

Wed Oct 21 11:05:22 PDT 2009

I simply quote, providing meaning to a term in your quote

"Complementarity" 

you are correct, there is no way I can lie about it.

how did you take the term to mean in the quote
from the SODV paper ? 

how was it supposed to support your view?

----- Original Message ----
From: MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Wed, October 21, 2009 1:57:27 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] Some historical perspective

It is whatever you think it to be, Ron, there's no way you can lie about it.

-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of X Acto
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 1:27 PM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] Some historical perspective

"A third piece of evidence that reveals the similarity between the
Metaphysics of Quality and Complementarity occurs when Bohr says, "We are
suspended in language," the Metaphysics of Quality completely agrees."  
  (SODV) 

"In a general sense, the concept of complementarity is used with 
regard to contrasting or even contradictory concepts, models, 
theories and views that represent different perspectives on reality 
and that together are more comprehensive than any one of them alone."
-Wiki 

Ron:
Kinda goes against your own assertion
and supports my own.
That SOM is one of many types of intellectual patterns.

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/