[MD] [MD} The relativity of the MoQ

[MarshaV]

Three-fold indeed!!!  And why I do not mess with magic...  




-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of John Carl
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 12:35 PM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] [MD} The relativity of the MoQ

Hey Marsha,

In the land of a thousand dances, you never know who's gonna be wigglin' on
stage...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAVj20GNRGo&feature=related


On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 12:39 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

>
> Hey John,
>
> Quality is a metaphor for what is indivisible, undefinable and unknowable.
>
> Or it could be the land of a thousand dances...
>
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyX8j3qQrIM&feature=related
>
>
> Too hilarious...
>
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org
> [mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of John Carl
> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 8:32 PM
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Subject: Re: [MD] [MD} The relativity of the MoQ
>
> Ok, then,  Much better it is.  I agree as well.  For me it overturns the
> idea of a static hierarchical morality with a more flowing and
> freedom-loving spirit.
>
> Quality is an axis AND a direction and the direction is toward the more
> dynamic on every level.  With the levels being relatively more dynamic in
> their evolutionary escalation.  When intellect turns toward the dark side
> (egoistic control of static patterns) then intellect is less moral than
> rocks, regardless of its vaunted evolutionary possibility.
>
> So I bet you don't think Quality is an object, do you Marsha?
>
> John the objector, not the objectifier
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:48 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >   I think he sees the DQ/sq split
> > > changes everything, and I agree.
> > >
> > >
> > > Marsha
> > >
> > >
> >
> > John, the stacker:
> > Well I agree as well.  But the question is, for the better?  Or the
> worse?
> >
> >
> > John,
> >
> > Better!  Much better!!
> >
> >
> > Marsha
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> >
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/