[MD] [MD} The relativity of the MoQ

X Acto xacto at rocketmail.com
Wed Sep 2 06:41:04 PDT 2009


you not answering my questions is boring too


Logic requires objective reasoning, it is constructed on the idea of concrete forms.
S/o is a construction built into our cultural glasses. If not, and it's the natural way
to see and interpret reality as a human being, then what is the use of MoQ?
Everything Pirsig says about SOM being an artifical construction, just "one of many ways
to interpret reality" is therefore wrong and incorrect and makes SOM correct, the natural
way humans see the world, other cultures are simply undeveloped. Other ways including
DQ/SQ are false, it makes seeing things as patterns a construction and seeing things
as objects natural. DQ/SQ is simply a construction invented by a man named Robert
Pirsig, he did not discover DQ/SQ under a microscope or in a supercollider he invented
it. So why disregard the natural way we percieve reality for one mans invention?
why call an object a collection of patterns? when an object is truer to our perception?


      



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list