[MD] [MD} The relativity of the MoQ

Wed Sep 2 07:04:23 PDT 2009

If you agree that these examples are indeed intellectual patterns,
how can intellectual patterns not be on the intellectual level?

----- Original Message ----
From: MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2009 9:57:26 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] [MD} The relativity of the MoQ

Ron,

That's correct. Music, painting and dance are within the code of art.

Marsha

-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of X Acto
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 9:38 AM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] [MD} The relativity of the MoQ

Marsha:
I still agree with Bo that the Intellectual Level is the where patterns are
concerned with the objectification of abstract symbols, and I do not feel
uncomfortable that you, Ron, or even Steve, disagrees with me.    

Can you supply an Intellectual static pattern of value that is not
subject/object oriented??? 

Ron:
All intellectual patterns are not subject/object oriented
it's in the interpretation of them, therefore any intellectual
pattern I supply will therefore be interpretd as subject/object by you
if thats the way you want to interpret them.

thats the whole point of Pirsigs work

lets see

music
painting
dance

all intellectual patterns that are not subject/object oriented

unless you want to view them that way

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/