[MD] The relativity of the MoQ

[John Carl]

On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:55 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

>
> Greetings Arlo,



> . -  I still have no idea where Andre's "slightly worried" is
> directed, especially as it was in response to a post I sent.


Well I think I know.  I was just reading a
book<http://www.wisdom-books.com/ProductDetail.asp?PID=6735>about Zen
and I don't have it with me or I'd quote you the passage, but
basically, after all this discipline, effort, training and work, the
Enlightened One finds he has gotten absolutely nowhere!

Andre, probably, if he's at all like me, looks at this equation and thinks,
"can I just take a short-cut or something?"

And I say, YES!  Go ahead Andre  It's your path, you do what you want.



>  Do you have
> any idea?  180-degree Zen and 360-degree Zen seems to be some kind of
> abstract, symbolic Zen language.



I'd say 180 zen is for those going in the wrong direction and 360 is for
those who are basically headed in the right direction, but want smoother
circles in their life.  But I'm more of an up-and-down kinda guy myself.
 The spinning circles aren't as much fun as roller coasters, but they all go
in a circle of some kind so... its pretty inescapable eh?


Do you think one needs to join a Zen
> community, to 'get it'?  I might have thought so at one time, but I do not
> anymore.
>
>
Well traditionally speaking, Zen has always passed through a community, a
school.  All of its classic literature is compiled and passed along as a
communal effort, even though the effort of writing is always a solitary
activity, the writer is composing for a reader in his imagination or why
even bother?

John the butter-inner