[MD] Loneliness

[MarshaV]

Dave,

Balance overall? Over time?  No, time is a static pattern of value?
Fifty/fifty?  Would forty-five/fifty-five be okay?  Who'd do the measuring?
This balance sounds like another static pattern of value of the
intellectual-kind.  What definition of balance were you thinking of?  I
doubt in the emerging Quality Level that this would be a concern.   


Marsha     



-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of David Thomas
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 2:52 PM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] Loneliness

On 9/11/09 12:08 PM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

> I like the Inorganic, Biological, Social & Intellectual Levels, and an
> emerging Quality Level.

Right, I mistyped, Inorganic at the bottom not Organic.

My cultural glasses maybe a little rosy but the media dishes up plenty
enough daily blue to keep them steamed from shades of violet to black.

> And btw, RMP didn't use the yin/yang concept in the MoQ.
Right, but he does discuss the need for balance between static and dynamic
in numerous places which is the rhetorical essence of the "yin yang"
expression. 

Dave


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/