[MD] Uncertainty
Joseph Maurer
jhmau at sbcglobal.net
Wed Sep 16 13:04:01 PDT 2009
On 9/15/09 10:39 PM, "John Carl" <ridgecoyote at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I believe that the MoQ teaches that while Quality is undefinable as a
> concept, it is an apprehensible experience. In other words, Quality can
> only be defined in experience. This experience is all the precision
> needed for morality.
>
Hi John and all,
Logic requires the formulation for 1 for a description of morality rather
than ³experience.²
An experiential morality denies the advances in scientific exploration. If
1 is defined then 2 is greater than 1. The difficulty of evolution is that
the undefined comes in different flavors and 1/0 though not popular
indicates that there is more than one definition of 1. Pirsig likes 4
flavors for evolution. Esoteric literature sees 7 flavors for evolution.
Whatever the number, the level of evolution becomes the basis for a new 1,
which adds logic to the experience of morality rather than experience alone..
Joe
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi John and all,
>>
>> Imho in a DQ/SQ metaphysics there will always be something undefined in our
>> knowledge. SOM proposed that the undefined was found in S. Does that mean
>> that I can¹t be held responsible for what I am doing? Morality requires an
>> evolutionary environment for precision.
>>
>
>
> Joe,
>
> I believe that the MoQ teaches that while Quality is undefinable as a
> concept, it is an apprehensible experience. In other words, Quality can
> only be defined in experience. This experience is all the precision
> needed for morality.
>
>
> John, humming along
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list