[MD] Uncertainty

Joseph Maurer jhmau at sbcglobal.net
Wed Sep 16 13:04:01 PDT 2009


On 9/15/09 10:39 PM, "John Carl" <ridgecoyote at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> I believe that the MoQ teaches that while Quality is undefinable as a
> concept, it is an apprehensible experience.  In other words, Quality can
> only be defined in experience.   This experience is all the precision
> needed for morality.
>

Hi John and all,

Logic requires the formulation for 1 for a description of morality rather
than ³experience.²

An experiential morality denies the advances in scientific exploration.  If
1 is defined then 2 is greater than 1.  The difficulty of evolution is that
the undefined comes in different flavors and 1/0 though not popular
indicates that there is more than one definition of 1.  Pirsig likes 4
flavors for evolution.  Esoteric literature sees 7 flavors for evolution.
Whatever the number, the level of evolution becomes the basis for a new 1,
which adds logic to the experience of morality rather than experience alone..

Joe

>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hi John and all,
>> 
>> Imho in a DQ/SQ metaphysics there will always be something undefined in our
>> knowledge.  SOM proposed that the undefined was found in S. Does that mean
>> that I can¹t be held responsible for what I am doing?  Morality requires an
>> evolutionary environment for precision.
>> 
> 
> 
> Joe,
> 
> I believe that the MoQ teaches that while Quality is undefinable as a
> concept, it is an apprehensible experience.  In other words,  Quality can
> only be defined in experience.    This experience is all the precision
> needed for morality.
> 
> 
> John, humming along
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/






More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list