[MD] Uncertainty

[markhsmit]

Hi all,
This notion of quality being undefinable and only an experience is all
a bunch of semantic nonsense!

Like the rule not to worship idols.  You have to worship the real thing...

A definition is an experience!  Where do you draw the line at what is
experience and what isn't?  Reading these posts is an experience.
When I think of the definition of water, that is an experience.    
Show me some definition that is not an experience.
Labeling something as undefinable is a definition, and that
definition is an experience.  When you define Quality, 
that is an experience.  Dividing reality up into definitions and experience
is pure nonsense and doesn't lead anywhere.  It is phantom reasoning
through semantics.

Cheers,
Willblake2

On Sep 15, 2009, at 10:39:25 PM, "John Carl" <ridgecoyote at gmail.com> wrote:
From:   "John Carl" <ridgecoyote at gmail.com>
Subject:    Re: [MD] Uncertainty
Date:   September 15, 2009 10:39:25 PM PDT
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>
>
>
> Hi John and all,
>
> Imho in a DQ/SQ metaphysics there will always be something undefined in our
> knowledge. SOM proposed that the undefined was found in S. Does that mean
> that I can¹t be held responsible for what I am doing? Morality requires an
> evolutionary environment for precision.
>


Joe,

I believe that the MoQ teaches that while Quality is undefinable as a
concept, it is an apprehensible experience. In other words, Quality can
only be defined in experience. This experience is all the precision
needed for morality.


John, humming along
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/