[MD] The Word is Not the Thing
plattholden at gmail.com
plattholden at gmail.com
Mon Sep 21 16:10:10 PDT 2009
On 21 Sep 2009 at 17:14, Arlo Bensinger wrote:
> Language is fundamentally recursive, and hence paradox laden.
Then that statement is fundamentally recursive and paradox laden, i.e.,
profoundly incoherent.
> Or you could maybe fault that profoundly incoherent Pirsig for saying
> "Quality is undefinable", thus defining Quality.
Thanks for making my point because Pirsig went on to say:
"Since a metaphysics is essentially a kind of dialectical definition and
since Quality is essentially outside definition, this means that a
"Metaphysics of Quality" is essentially a contradiction in terms, a logical
absurdity." (Lila, 5)
If anyone wonders why the MOQ remains academically stillborn this
admission from Pirsig is probably the reason. Postmodern thinking (It's a
fact there are no facts.) is passe in the academy although there are still
a few hangers-on. Logic has regained respect in most classrooms, thank
goodness.
> Of course, Pirsig and other "postmodern minds" would simply say "...
> INCLUDING this statement!" or make a nod to the incomplete-recursive
> nature of language as being, as Zeno found, always present.
There he goes again -- "always present" -- incomplete and recursive, or
so he says, contradicting himself.
Ah, well . . . what's the use?
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list