[MD] ego vs self

[MarshaV]

Bo,

Maybe the best said is a suggestion to meditate.  Or maybe I'm nuts.  


Marsha  



-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of
skutvik at online.no
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 4:19 AM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] ego vs self

Marsha 

25 Sep.you  wrote:

> The problem is that once you start talking about the MoQ it becomes an
> intellectual static pattern of value and suffers objectification. 

I'm no adherer of language as the great "sinner". After it's introduction 
sometime in the social era (I waver here, at times I see it as the 
biological pattern that triggered the Q-social development)  the 
biological sense-patterned intelligence became word-patterned. While 
still at the social level the internal-thinking/external-speaking  
distinction wasn't emphasized. Humans communicated with gods out 
loud or silent in many ways. Only with the intellectual level did silent 
language become "thinking" taking place in a compartment called 
mind (called "intellect" by intellect) Yet both the silent and the out-loud 
- as well as the written - varieties considered different from an alleged 
reality "out there".  

> On the Dynamic/static level, above the Intellectual Level, there is
> only patterned experience and Dynamic experience.  

Yes, the MOQ is the DQ/SQ configuration, but even the MOQ must 
apply language-conveyed intelligence to forward its  message.     
   
Bodvar






Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/