[MD] because
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Sun Apr 11 23:26:53 PDT 2010
John,
For me truth is relative. The Ultimate (not Absolute) Truth can only be
approached through the non-affirming negative, and why I so much
like: not this, not that.
On Apr 12, 2010, at 12:20 AM, John Carl wrote:
> "There is another important matter: the *question* of Truth is not the same
> thing as truth. I am not entering into metaphysics here. The question is
> not truth, because it is not the question that a person asks themselves
> about their own life or experience. This sort of question (THEE question of
> Truth) is just another intellectual game and a way of remaining outside
> truth. After all, it does not matter if one can answer or not, nor does it
> matter whether the answer is personal or is objectified as philosophy or
> revelation. But when a person asks about their *own* life (consciously or
> unconsciously), then the real *question* of truth has been asked.
>
> And when anyone claims to have resolved it, they are lying.
This is more likely the reason I was uncomfortable with someone
telling me I am right.
>
> When they try to answer this question within the framework of reality alone,
> they have no answer to offer. The question which their life puts to them in
> all its aspect and its expressions remans an open question. It is
> continually being put to them, and this IS truth itself.
An open question is truth?
Marsha
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:57 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>
>> it makes me giggle...
>>
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2010, at 8:52 AM, X Acto wrote:
>>
>>> relativly speaking of course
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>> From: MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
>>> To: MoQ <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
>>> Sent: Sun, April 11, 2010 3:27:20 AM
>>> Subject: [MD] because
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "It is because emptiness reveals and expresses the relativity
>>> of all phenomena that it becomes the key to understanding
>>> non-duality. We can see how recognition of the relativity
>>> -- and subsequent transcendence -- of opposites is tantamount
>>> to the perception of non-duality, or non-differentiation."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> For those who shun relativism, it is interesting how every other
>>> statement points to it. Academic styled language be damned.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list