[MD] Reading & Comprehension
david buchanan
dmbuchanan at hotmail.com
Sun Apr 18 17:29:30 PDT 2010
Mary said to dmb:
...What I would say is that it occurs to me that there are basically two ways you can approach the MoQ. Either you take a Western road to get there via James and the Pragmatists or Empiricists; or you come at it from the Eastern Buddhist perspective. Both are valid. It seems to me that those who have an Eastern appreciation are much more likely to see the Intellectual Level as SOM than those who are approaching from the other road. I guess this makes neither one wrong, but IMHO the MoQ has much greater explanatory power when the Intellectual Level is viewed as SOM than when it is not. ... Much to my own surprise, I find that I am becoming daily more and more in the Eastern mysticism camp.
dmb says:
Well, I think that ZAMM is an East meets West kind of thing and so the trick is to see that James's approach and the Zen approach are actually the same approach. There is a paper on-line you might be interested in pondering. It starts out like this....
The Varieties of Pure Experience: William James and Kitaro Nishida on Consciousness and Embodiment
Joel W. Krueger
1. Introduction The notion of "pure experience" is one of the most intriguing and simultaneously perplexing features of William James's writings. There seems to be little consensus in the secondary literature as to how to understand this notion, and precisely what function it serves within the overall structure of James's thought. Yet James himself regards this idea as the cornerstone of his radical empiricism. And the latter, James felt, was his unique contribution to the history of philosophy; he believed that philosophy "was on the eve of a considerable rearrangement" when his essay "A World of Pure Experience" was first published in 1904. While Western philosophy is still perhaps awaiting this "considerable rearrangement," James's notion of pure experience was quickly appropriated by another thinker who in fact did inaugurate a considerable rearrangement of his own intellectual tradition: the Japanese philosopher Kitaro Nishida (1870—1945), the founder and most important figure of the Kyoto School of modern Japanese philosophy.1 Kitaro Nishida is widely recognized as Japan's foremost modern philosopher. His earliest major work, An Inquiry into the Good (1911), is generally considered to be the founding statement of the Kyoto School of modern Japanese philosophy. Other prominent Kyoto School figures, including Hajime Tanabe (1885–1962), Keiji Nishitani (1900–1990), and Masao Abe (1915– ), each acknowledged the profound influence of Nishida's work on their own intellectual development. Pluralistic in his outlook and comparative in his methodology, Nishida was throughout his life deeply influenced by a number of western thinkers and religious figures (a trait shared by most other prominent Kyoto School figures). For instance, Nishida speaks favorably of Augustine, Kant, Hegel and Bergson, and concedes that these Western thinkers, among others, had a hand in shaping his thought.2 But it was with James's formulation of pure experience that Nishida first believed that he had found a conceptual apparatus upon which he could ground the characteristic themes and concerns that have since been designated "Nishida Philosophy." Additionally, Nishida felt that James's idea of pure experience was able to preserve some of the more important features of Buddhist thought that Nishida looked to incorporate into his own system. Though he was only to practice Zen meditation for a relatively short time, the distinctively Zen concern with cultivating an intuitive, pre-reflective insight into the nature of reality and experience was conjoined, in Nishida, with the Western emphasis on logic and argumentative rigor in a somewhat unlikely alliance.
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_1
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list