[MD] indefensible yet enlightening
Mary
marysonthego at gmail.com
Sun Apr 25 16:22:28 PDT 2010
Hi John,
Yeah, it's a problem. That ole symbol manipulation can be so subjective.
Does everybody think in pictures first, then grope around for words to fit?
Or is it just me?
No, wait. Pirsig wrote a couple of books about that pre-intellectual
cutting edge of reality thing. That's good. Thought I was crazy there for
a minute. :)
Mary
>
> Meaning is uncertain; therefore I must constantly fine-tune my
> language and
> work at reinterpreting the words I hear. I try to understand what the
> other
> person says to me. All language is more or less a riddle to be figured
> out;
> it is like interpreting a text that has many possible meanings. In my
> effort at understanding and interpretation, I establish definitions,
> and
> finally a meaning.
>
>
> The thick haze of discourse produces meaning.
>
>
> All of intellectual life (and I use the word "all" advisedly) even that
> of
> specialist in the most exact sciences, is based on these instabilities,
> failures to understand, and errors in interpretation, which we must
> find a
> way to go beyond and overcome.
>
>
> Mistaking a person's language keeps me from "taking" the person--from
> taking
> him prisoner.
>
>
> We are in the presence of an infinitely and unexpectedly rich tool, so
> that
> the tiniest phrase unleashes an entire polyphonic gamut of meaning, The
> ambiguity of language, and even its ambivalence and its contradiction,
> between the moment it is spoken and the moment it is received produce
> extremely intense activities. Without such activities, we would be
> ants or
> bees, and our drama and tragedy would quickly be dried up and empty.
>
>
> Between the moment of speech and the moment of reception are born
> symbol,
> metaphor and analogy.
>
>
> Through language I lay hold of two completely different objects. I
> bring
> them together, establishing between them a relationship of similarity
> or
> even identity. In this manner I come to know this distant, unknown
> object,
> through its resemblance.
>
>
> It becomes intelligible to me, because through language I have brought
> it
> near this other one that I know well. Tis an astonishing process, and
> logically a foolish one. It is obviously an indefensible operation,
> yet
> there it is, utterly successful, utterly enlightening.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list