[MD] horse pattern

[MarshaV]

horse pattern:  

Let's take, for instance, the pattern: horse.  I understand horse to 
be a biological static pattern of value.  It's also best for me to 
understand it as opposite-of-non-horse.  By doing so I allow for 
many individual's history of the pattern.  If one individual's exposure 
to horse has been only through books(words & pictures) it will be a 
limited pattern.  Another individual's exposure to horse may include 
growing up on a horse ranch and it will be a much broader/deeper 
pattern which most likely will contain smell and once bitten by a horse.     
All aspects are conceptual whether then are thoughts, sights, smell, 
sounds, tastes, touch. 

Concepts held in consciousness, whatever that may be.     

Marsha
 








On Apr 30, 2010, at 6:34 AM, Horse wrote:

> Precisely Marsha
> Do you now see the problems that are the consequence of seeing SOM as the intellectual level.
> It destroys the beauty and harmony of the MoQ. Pirsigs work is mangled almost beyond recognition.
> Intellectual patterns of value are the Intellectual level and vice versa. Not SOM. If you go down that path then there are some serious consequences.
> I'll get back to Platt later on today as I have a fairly packed day going through someone else's remix of one of my more complex songs.
> Who the hell said being unemployed was a life of leisure!!
> 
> On 30/04/2010 09:43, MarshaV wrote:
>> Platt&  Bo,
>> 
>> Now you two have me confused.  I understand it to be that
>> the Social Level is made of social-spovs, and the Intellectual
>> (SOM) Level is made up of intellectual-spovs, and the Biological
>> Level was made up of biological-spovs, etc., and that ALL
>> patterns are conceptual.
>> 
>> Wow!  What a mess.
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>>