[MD] Pirsig's theory of truth

[Steven Peterson]

DMB,

I said:
> This is not to say that radical empiricism may not do anything extra
> for you in terms of metaphysics, it is just that it doesn't do
> anything for you in terms epistemology that we can't have in other
> ways.

Steve:
Let me and that one thing that radical empiricism is quite good for is
critiquing traditional "sense impression" empricism as not being
empirical enough. As a form of anti-foundationalism it is good stuff.
But when it gets reasserted later as a quasi-foundation for supporting
epistemology it is either useless or a step backward into
foundationalism.

Best,
Steve