[MD] MOQ Recursion

[ADRIE KINTZIGER]

a concept inflated within a concept to deploy a redefinition of the
conceptual, this will not stay Moqrehensible.

2010/8/2 Arlo Bensinger <ajb102 at psu.edu>

> [Mary]
> The levels are not 'concepts'.
>
> [Arlo]
> If we use the MOQ to examine the MOQ, what kind of patterns are the MOQ
> "levels"?
>
> For example, we say the "inorganic level" consists of "inorganic patterns
> of value", but is what we call the "inorganic level" also an "inorganic
> pattern of value"?
>
> Nearly all of us would say no, right?
>
> So is the "inorganic level" an "intellectual pattern of value"? If not,
> what IS it?
>
> If it is not an inorganic or biological or social or intellectual pattern
> of value, what is it?
>
> Bo has proposed a 'expansion of reality', and from his posts I gather you
> all see the answer being that the "levels" are "MOQ patterns of value", a
> new level of patterns sitting above the intellectual level".
>
> Is this right or wrong, and if wrong, what type of pattern is "the
> inorganic level", or any/all of the "levels"?
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>



-- 
parser